A Publication of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship at Barton College


Volume 1, No. 1
Online ISSN: 3071-0898

Copyright

© The authors. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex and How It Relates to Strength and Performance

CONFERENCE ABSTRACT

Christopher “Walt” Williams* and Lauren Biscardi⁺

School of Health Sciences, Barton College, Wilson, NC, USA
*Student author, ⁺Faculty mentor


CITATION

Williams, Christopher W.; & Biscardi, Lauren. (2026). The lumbo-pelvic-hip complex and how it relates to strength and performance [Conference abstract]. Barton Journal, 1(1), 190–191. https://bartonjournal.org/vol-1-no-1/2026-cat4-article-no-035


Abstract

The lumbo-pelvic-hip complex is crucial for generating forces, as well as enhancing movement efficacy. Anatomical variations within the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex could potentially affect both an athlete’s ability to produce strength and perform movements efficiently. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between lumbo-pelvic-hip complex anthropometrics (leg length, femur length, and trunk length) and measures of strength and functional movement. It was hypothesized that these structural variables would significantly relate to both force production and movement quality. Thirteen athletes from various collegiate sports completed the assessments. Lower extremity anthropometry and athletic performance was assessed through two separate strength tests: the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and the isometric mid-shin pull (IMSP). Additionally, all participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Leg length demonstrated significant positive correlations with IMTP max (r = .655, p = .015) and IMSP max (r = .683, p = .010), and a significant negative correlation with FMS scores (r = −.727, p = .005). Femur length was significantly negatively correlated with FMS scores (r = −.589, p = .034), but showed no significant relationships with strength measures. Trunk length had a significant positive correlation with IMSP max (r = .589, p = .034) and a significant negative correlation with FMS scores (r = −.676, p = .011). A very strong positive correlation was found between IMTP max and IMSP max (r = .982, p < .001). Both IMTP max (r = −.701, p = .008) and IMSP max (r = −.776, p = .002) were significantly negatively correlated with FMS scores. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that anthropometric variations of the lumbopelvic-hip complex can affect both an athlete’s strength performance and their movement quality. While longer limbs are likely to result in greater force production due to increased mechanical advantage, they may compromise movement quality and increase susceptibility to injury.

Keywords: lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, athletes, human performance

Category I Articles
(3000–5000 words)

Full-length Article. Comprehensive, original research study common in the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields. Presents research questions, methods, findings, and implications in full detail.

Review Article. Critical synthesis of existing scholarship across a discipline or subfield, often in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Identifies major debates, trends, and gaps in the literature.

Technical Report. Detailed account of applied research, development, or project-based work, typically used in engineering, technology, environmental science, and public policy. Emphasizes procedures, data, and practical results.

Category II Articles
(1500–3000 Words)

Case Study. An in-depth examination of a single event, individual, organization, or community, used widely in business, education, medicine, social sciences, and public policy to illustrate broader concepts.

Creative Scholarship. Scholarly work grounded in artistic, literary, or creative practices. Explores craft, process, or interpretation as a form of inquiry accompanied by explanatory text.

Critical Essay. An argument-driven analysis of a text, issue, or concept, common in the humanities and cultural studies. Prioritizes interpretation, critique, and original perspective.

Data Paper. Documentation-focused article describing a dataset’s collection, structure, and potential uses. Common in sciences, social sciences, and humanities.

Methodology Paper. Focused exploration of research methods, designs, or analytical tools across disciplines such as psychology, biology, statistics, and communication studies. Emphasizes innovation or refinement of methods.

Replication Study. Study that reproduces prior research to test reliability and validity, especially in psychology, economics, biomedical sciences, and education.

Research Note. Short report presenting preliminary findings, emerging questions, or early-stage results. Used in sciences and social sciences to share timely insights.Short article. Condensed research piece that presents a focused analysis, small study, or partial findings across disciplines.

Category III Articles
(750–1000 Words)

Book/Media Review. Evaluative overview of a recent book, film, performance, or digital media, used across humanities, social sciences, and interdisciplinary fields.

Brief. Concise report summarizing key findings, updates, or policy-relevant information, common in public policy, health, and applied sciences.

Commentary. Short, argument-based reflection on a current issue, debate, or publication, common across disciplines.

Letter. Short communication addressing a specific study, idea, or dataset, used in sciences, social sciences, and some humanities fields.

Perspective. Reflective or viewpoint-driven piece offering an informed disciplinary interpretation of an issue, trend, or method.

Category IV Articles
(Abstracts)

Extended Abstract (300–700 Words). A more detailed, mini-article format often used in STEM and interdisciplinary conferences, including background, methods, and preliminary findings.

Conference Abstract (150–300 Words). Concise summary of proposed conference research, outlining the question, approach, and significance across any academic discipline.