A Publication of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship at Barton College


Volume 1, No. 1
Online ISSN: 3071-0898

Copyright

© The authors. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Exercise Intensity Prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review Comparing High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training

CONFERENCE ABSTRACT

Carleigh Parker* and Lauren Biscardi⁺

School of Health Sciences, Barton College, Wilson, NC, USA
*Student author, ⁺Faculty mentor


CITATION

Parker, Carleigh; & Biscardi, Lauren. (2026). Exercise intensity prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: A narrative review comparing high-intensity interval training versus moderate continuous training [Conference abstract]. Barton Journal, 1(1), 182–183. https://bartonjournal.org/vol-1-no-1/2026-cat4-article-no-031


Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation is a critical component of secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease, with exercise prescription playing the central role in improving patient outcomes. Moderate continuous training (MCT) is the standard approach; however, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a potential alternative to MCT. This narrative review aims to compare HIIT and MCT in cardiac rehabilitation, focusing on physiological effectiveness, clinical outcomes, safety considerations, adherence, and clinical decision-making. This narrative review synthesizes current literature examining HIIT and MCT within cardiac rehabilitation settings. Peer-reviewed studies were identified, with emphasis on adult cardiac populations; specifically individuals post-myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafts, stents, and heart failure. Articles were selected based on relevance to key subtopics, including cardiovascular adaptations, functional outcomes, adverse events, and patient adherence. The findings were analyzed to identify consistent themes and differences between training modalities. Current evidence suggests that, while maintaining a safe environment when appropriately prescribed and supervised, HIIT may obtain greater improvements in aerobic capacity and cardiovascular function compared to MCT Additionally, HIIT may enhance patient adherence due to its time efficiency and variability. However, considerations regarding patient risk stratification and program design remain crucial. Understanding the benefits and limitations of HIIT and MCT can help improve individualized exercise prescription and optimize outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation, particularly for younger or previously active patients. 

Keywords: HIIT, high-intensity interval training, MCT, moderate continuous training, rehabilitation

Category I Articles
(3000–5000 words)

Full-length Article. Comprehensive, original research study common in the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields. Presents research questions, methods, findings, and implications in full detail.

Review Article. Critical synthesis of existing scholarship across a discipline or subfield, often in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Identifies major debates, trends, and gaps in the literature.

Technical Report. Detailed account of applied research, development, or project-based work, typically used in engineering, technology, environmental science, and public policy. Emphasizes procedures, data, and practical results.

Category II Articles
(1500–3000 Words)

Case Study. An in-depth examination of a single event, individual, organization, or community, used widely in business, education, medicine, social sciences, and public policy to illustrate broader concepts.

Creative Scholarship. Scholarly work grounded in artistic, literary, or creative practices. Explores craft, process, or interpretation as a form of inquiry accompanied by explanatory text.

Critical Essay. An argument-driven analysis of a text, issue, or concept, common in the humanities and cultural studies. Prioritizes interpretation, critique, and original perspective.

Data Paper. Documentation-focused article describing a dataset’s collection, structure, and potential uses. Common in sciences, social sciences, and humanities.

Methodology Paper. Focused exploration of research methods, designs, or analytical tools across disciplines such as psychology, biology, statistics, and communication studies. Emphasizes innovation or refinement of methods.

Replication Study. Study that reproduces prior research to test reliability and validity, especially in psychology, economics, biomedical sciences, and education.

Research Note. Short report presenting preliminary findings, emerging questions, or early-stage results. Used in sciences and social sciences to share timely insights.Short article. Condensed research piece that presents a focused analysis, small study, or partial findings across disciplines.

Category III Articles
(750–1000 Words)

Book/Media Review. Evaluative overview of a recent book, film, performance, or digital media, used across humanities, social sciences, and interdisciplinary fields.

Brief. Concise report summarizing key findings, updates, or policy-relevant information, common in public policy, health, and applied sciences.

Commentary. Short, argument-based reflection on a current issue, debate, or publication, common across disciplines.

Letter. Short communication addressing a specific study, idea, or dataset, used in sciences, social sciences, and some humanities fields.

Perspective. Reflective or viewpoint-driven piece offering an informed disciplinary interpretation of an issue, trend, or method.

Category IV Articles
(Abstracts)

Extended Abstract (300–700 Words). A more detailed, mini-article format often used in STEM and interdisciplinary conferences, including background, methods, and preliminary findings.

Conference Abstract (150–300 Words). Concise summary of proposed conference research, outlining the question, approach, and significance across any academic discipline.