CONFERENCE ABSTRACT
Takyla Graham* and Tamara Avant⁺
School of Health Sciences, Barton College, Wilson, NC, USA
*Student author, ⁺Faculty mentor
CITATION
Graham, Takyla; & Avant, Tamara. (2026). Advantages and disadvantages of taking a gap year before undergrad and graduate school [Conference abstract]. Barton Journal, 1(1), 152–153. https://bartonjournal.org/vol-1-no-1/2026-cat4-article-no-014
Abstract
Taking a gap year can improve students’ academic performance, likely because those students adopt a growth mindset (Blackburn et al, 2005). I hypothesized that participants who took a gap year (before entering either undergraduate or graduate school) are more prepared and have better academic performance than students who did not take a gap year. Participants (N = 46) were current and former college students who answered a questionnaire on their gap year status, self-assessments (i.e., how they feel), and an evaluation (i.e., their behavior/actions) of their academic preparedness and performance. Independent t-tests showed that results did not match my hypothesis, as there was no significant difference in perceived performance for those taking a gap year (M = 3.41, SD = 1.08) or not (M = 3.88, SD = 0.64), t(44) = 1.29, p = 0.20. There were also no significant differences in their perceived preparedness for college, t(44) = 1.38, p = 0.17. However, students who felt more prepared for college had a higher average performance evaluation (M = 4.01, SD = 0.77) than students who felt less prepared for college (M = 3.13, SD = 0.63), t(44) = 2.88, p < 0.01. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between the preparedness and performance evaluations for all participants (r(44) = 0.86, p < .0001), but this relationship was stronger for participants who took a gap year (r(3) = 0.95, p = 0.05) than those who did not (r(41) = 0.83, p < .0001).
Keywords: gap year, academic performance
References
Blackburn, George Alan; Clark, Gordon; & Pilgrim, David. (2005). The gap year for geographers: Effects and paradoxes. Geography, 90(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2005.12094115

