A Publication of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship at Barton College


Volume 1, No. 1
Online ISSN: 3071-0898

Copyright

© The authors. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The Role of Outdoor Playing Surface Quality on Injury Prevention and Performance: A Narrative Review

CONFERENCE ABSTRACT

Kathryn Robinson*, Lauren Biscardi⁺, and Charlie Ottinger⁺

School of Health Sciences, Barton College, Wilson, NC, USA
*Student author, ⁺Faculty mentor


CITATION

Robinson, Kathryn; Biscardi, Lauren; & Ottinger, Charlie. (2026). The role of outdoor playing surface quality on injury prevention and performance: A narrative review [Conference abstract]. Barton Journal, 1(1), 207–208. https://bartonjournal.org/vol-1-no-1/2026-cat4-article-no-044


Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries commonly occur during noncontact movements like landing and jumping, making biomechanics a key factor in injury risk. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), along with research on playing surfaces and athlete perceptions, highlights how environmental and movement factors influence injury likelihood. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in athletes’ Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores and perceived risk of lower-extremity injury when performing on natural grass versus artificial turf surfaces, as well as to determine how the playing surface may influence injury risk among athletes. Twelve female collegiate soccer athletes (21 ± 3 yrs) completed a modified questionnaire (Mears et al., 2018) on perceived injury risk. Participants then performed three jump-landing trials from a 12-inch box on both surfaces. Trials were recorded and scored using the 19-point Landing Error Scoring System analysis tool, validated to reliably measure potential injury risk (Padua et al., 2015). The data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences in LESS scores between the artificial turf and the natural grass surfaces. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. All participants believed field conditions increased injury risk, and 75% reported a surface-related injury, with 50% citing grass as the increased risk, and 50% citing turf. Bumpy, hard, and inconsistent conditions were most frequently cited as conditions that may increase injury risk. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed the data were not normally distributed, W = 0.78, p = .006. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated there was a significant difference in LESS scores between turf and grass playing surfaces, z = -3.06, p = .002, r = -1.00. LESS scores on the turf (Mdn = 4.0) were lower than LESS Scores on the grass (Mdn = 5.5). According to LESS criteria, 83% scored in a worse category on natural grass, while 17% remained in the same category. Both perceived and measured injury risk were influenced by surface type. Natural grass, particularly when poorly maintained, was associated with worse landing mechanics and higher perceived risk. These findings suggest alignment between subjective and objective measures and highlight the need for improved field maintenance and further research on surface properties.

Keywords: ACL, Anterior cruciate ligament, athletes


References

Mears, Aimee C.; Osei-Owusu, Paul; Harland, Andy R.; Owen, Alun; & Roberts, Jonathan R. (2018). Perceived links between playing surfaces and injury: A worldwide study of elite association football players. Sports Medicine – Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0155-y

Padua, Darin A.; DiStefano, Lindsay J.; Beutler, Anthony I.; De La Motte, Sarah J.; DiStefano, Michael J.; & Marshall, Steven W. (2015). The landing error scoring system as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury-prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 50(6), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.10

Category I Articles
(3000–5000 words)

Full-length Article. Comprehensive, original research study common in the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields. Presents research questions, methods, findings, and implications in full detail.

Review Article. Critical synthesis of existing scholarship across a discipline or subfield, often in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Identifies major debates, trends, and gaps in the literature.

Technical Report. Detailed account of applied research, development, or project-based work, typically used in engineering, technology, environmental science, and public policy. Emphasizes procedures, data, and practical results.

Category II Articles
(1500–3000 Words)

Case Study. An in-depth examination of a single event, individual, organization, or community, used widely in business, education, medicine, social sciences, and public policy to illustrate broader concepts.

Creative Scholarship. Scholarly work grounded in artistic, literary, or creative practices. Explores craft, process, or interpretation as a form of inquiry accompanied by explanatory text.

Critical Essay. An argument-driven analysis of a text, issue, or concept, common in the humanities and cultural studies. Prioritizes interpretation, critique, and original perspective.

Data Paper. Documentation-focused article describing a dataset’s collection, structure, and potential uses. Common in sciences, social sciences, and humanities.

Methodology Paper. Focused exploration of research methods, designs, or analytical tools across disciplines such as psychology, biology, statistics, and communication studies. Emphasizes innovation or refinement of methods.

Replication Study. Study that reproduces prior research to test reliability and validity, especially in psychology, economics, biomedical sciences, and education.

Research Note. Short report presenting preliminary findings, emerging questions, or early-stage results. Used in sciences and social sciences to share timely insights.Short article. Condensed research piece that presents a focused analysis, small study, or partial findings across disciplines.

Category III Articles
(750–1000 Words)

Book/Media Review. Evaluative overview of a recent book, film, performance, or digital media, used across humanities, social sciences, and interdisciplinary fields.

Brief. Concise report summarizing key findings, updates, or policy-relevant information, common in public policy, health, and applied sciences.

Commentary. Short, argument-based reflection on a current issue, debate, or publication, common across disciplines.

Letter. Short communication addressing a specific study, idea, or dataset, used in sciences, social sciences, and some humanities fields.

Perspective. Reflective or viewpoint-driven piece offering an informed disciplinary interpretation of an issue, trend, or method.

Category IV Articles
(Abstracts)

Extended Abstract (300–700 Words). A more detailed, mini-article format often used in STEM and interdisciplinary conferences, including background, methods, and preliminary findings.

Conference Abstract (150–300 Words). Concise summary of proposed conference research, outlining the question, approach, and significance across any academic discipline.