A Publication of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship at Barton College


Volume 1, No. 1
Online ISSN: 3071-0898

Copyright

© The authors. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0 License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The Most Effective Way to Communicate While Coaching Athletes

CONFERENCE ABSTRACT

Kale Grehan* and Lauren Biscardi⁺

School of Health Sciences, Barton College, Wilson, NC, USA
*Student author, ⁺Faculty mentor


CITATION

Grehan, Kale; & Biscardi, Lauren. (2026). The most effective way to communicate while coaching athletes [Conference abstract]. Barton Journal 1(1), 199–200. https://bartonjournal.org/vol-1-no-1/2026-cat4-article-no-040


Abstract

Lacrosse is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Field Lacrosse and Box Lacrosse have seen exponential growth over the past decade, although both versions are extremely different. Field Lacrosse is played on a football field with 10 players per team on the field, making it a much more technical game. The 80-second shot clock allows for longer possessions and more time to set up on both offense and defense. Box Lacrosse is played in a hockey rink with 30-second shot clocks and five players per team. Box Lacrosse is all about quick decision-making and creating plays in a small area within a short amount of time. Based on accessibility to hockey rinks and equipment, Box Lacrosse is more popular in Canada, while Field Lacrosse is more popular in the United States. In North Carolina, there is barely any exposure to Box Lacrosse. In this study, 12 Field Lacrosse players were coached in Box Lacrosse over four sessions. Typically, it is easier for a Box Lacrosse player to be good at Field Lacrosse, but hard for a Field player to be good at Box Lacrosse. Field players have the skills, but some lack the quick decision-making that makes a successful Box player. To find out how to help an athlete be a successful Box player, the group of 12 was divided into two teams. Team 1 would only be communicated to while they are in live play. Team 2 would only be communicated to during rest periods on the bench. After three practices, the teams played against each other to see which communication style showed more improvement over the four sessions.  Using prior coaching knowledge, it was predicted that the coaching styles would not affect the improvement of the team, but would help the individual athletes.  This prediction was correct. Some athletes responded well to the different communication style, while others on the same team did not. This made the point that coaches need to get to know their athletes to find out what coaching and communication style works best for the individual athlete. Ultimately, it was found that a combination of the two styles is typically the best for the individual athlete, because talking to an athlete during live play is better for decision-making, while talking during a rest period helps teach.

Keywords: lacrosse, field lacrosse, box lacrosse, coaching

Category I Articles
(3000–5000 words)

Full-length Article. Comprehensive, original research study common in the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields. Presents research questions, methods, findings, and implications in full detail.

Review Article. Critical synthesis of existing scholarship across a discipline or subfield, often in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Identifies major debates, trends, and gaps in the literature.

Technical Report. Detailed account of applied research, development, or project-based work, typically used in engineering, technology, environmental science, and public policy. Emphasizes procedures, data, and practical results.

Category II Articles
(1500–3000 Words)

Case Study. An in-depth examination of a single event, individual, organization, or community, used widely in business, education, medicine, social sciences, and public policy to illustrate broader concepts.

Creative Scholarship. Scholarly work grounded in artistic, literary, or creative practices. Explores craft, process, or interpretation as a form of inquiry accompanied by explanatory text.

Critical Essay. An argument-driven analysis of a text, issue, or concept, common in the humanities and cultural studies. Prioritizes interpretation, critique, and original perspective.

Data Paper. Documentation-focused article describing a dataset’s collection, structure, and potential uses. Common in sciences, social sciences, and humanities.

Methodology Paper. Focused exploration of research methods, designs, or analytical tools across disciplines such as psychology, biology, statistics, and communication studies. Emphasizes innovation or refinement of methods.

Replication Study. Study that reproduces prior research to test reliability and validity, especially in psychology, economics, biomedical sciences, and education.

Research Note. Short report presenting preliminary findings, emerging questions, or early-stage results. Used in sciences and social sciences to share timely insights.Short article. Condensed research piece that presents a focused analysis, small study, or partial findings across disciplines.

Category III Articles
(750–1000 Words)

Book/Media Review. Evaluative overview of a recent book, film, performance, or digital media, used across humanities, social sciences, and interdisciplinary fields.

Brief. Concise report summarizing key findings, updates, or policy-relevant information, common in public policy, health, and applied sciences.

Commentary. Short, argument-based reflection on a current issue, debate, or publication, common across disciplines.

Letter. Short communication addressing a specific study, idea, or dataset, used in sciences, social sciences, and some humanities fields.

Perspective. Reflective or viewpoint-driven piece offering an informed disciplinary interpretation of an issue, trend, or method.

Category IV Articles
(Abstracts)

Extended Abstract (300–700 Words). A more detailed, mini-article format often used in STEM and interdisciplinary conferences, including background, methods, and preliminary findings.

Conference Abstract (150–300 Words). Concise summary of proposed conference research, outlining the question, approach, and significance across any academic discipline.